Material comparison

Ferrites vs. Soft Magnetic Composites

Three material families for magnetic flux control, and when each one is the right call.

Ferrites, soft magnetic composites (SMCs) and silicon-steel laminations are the three soft magnetic materials used for flux control in induction systems. Ferrites suit simple high-frequency shapes, laminations suit large low-frequency parts, and SMCs cover the full frequency range, work in 3D fields and machine into complex shapes.

Engineers choosing a magnetic flux controller for an induction coil have three material families to pick from: ferrites, soft magnetic composites (SMCs) and electrical steel laminations. No one of them wins everywhere, and the right choice depends on frequency, flux density, geometry and cooling. Fluxtrol makes SMCs, so this comparison is drawn from the published ASM Handbook Volume 4C chapter and Fluxtrol’s materials paper, and it names where ferrites and laminations are the better choice.

Comparison at a glance

FerritesElectrical steel laminationsSoft magnetic composites
Typical frequencyAbove about 100 kHz, up to 13.56 MHzUp to about 30 kHz (50 kHz in special cases)50 Hz to 13.56 MHz, by grade
Saturation flux densityLow, below about 0.3 to 0.4 THigh, about 1.7 TIntermediate (see products )
PermeabilityHigh in weak fieldsVery highLower, sufficient for open circuits
3D magnetic fieldsNot a typical useIntense eddy-current heatingPerform well
Temperature limitLow Curie point, thermal shockHigh, limited by coatingLimited by polymer binder, usually sufficient
MachinabilityBrittle, very hard, diamond toolsCut or stamped sheets, laborious assemblyMachinable with ordinary sharp or carbide tools
SizeStandard shapesVery large simple partsPlates up to 220 mm today
CoolingPoor thermal shock toleranceComplicatedConduction or internal water channels
PriceLowLowest for large partsHigher, partly offset by labor and performance

Ferrites

Ferrites are used for flux control in high-frequency applications, usually above 100 kHz: impeders for HF tube welding, inductors for sealing and plastic welding, and small brazing coils. They offer high permeability in weak fields, high electrical resistivity (not for all grades), chemical resistance, low cost and operation up to 13.56 MHz.

The drawbacks are low saturation flux density, a low Curie point, sensitivity to thermal shock, brittleness and hardness. Induction coil designs vary widely and few coils of any one type are built, so it is not economical to make net-shape ferrite controllers. Designers adapt coils to standard shapes such as plates, rods, C and E forms. Where volume justifies it, as with ferrite rods for tube welding impeders, special shapes are made.

Laminations

Laminations are the main material for low and middle frequencies: matching transformers, shunts and cores for melting furnaces, forge heating furnaces and large heat treating coils. Very large components of simple geometry are possible, such as furnace shunts several meters long. Saturation is high (about 1.7 T), losses are low at low frequency and temperature resistance is good.

Limits are poor performance in 3D magnetic fields, limited machinability, laborious assembly, a frequency ceiling and complicated cooling. Individual laminations are typically 0.5 to 1 mm thick at line frequency and can be as thin as 0.002 in. at higher frequency, which makes them harder to work with as frequency rises. Laminations suit channel furnaces and large crucible shunts, where field geometry is simple, volume is large and cost matters.

Soft magnetic composites

SMCs are iron or iron-alloy particles, each insulated and held in an organic binder. Because eddy currents are limited to individual particles, SMCs work in 3D fields and across the whole induction range. Losses are comparable to laminations at low frequency and to ferrites at high frequency, thermal conductivity reaches up to 0.2 W/cm K, and the material can be cooled by conduction to copper or by internal water channels. Machining is easier than for laminations, and parts with walls under 1 mm have been produced.

Drawbacks: temperature resistance is lower than laminations, plate dimensions are limited, and the purchase price is higher. With labor and performance included, SMCs are often cheaper than laminations in total.

SMC versus ferrite in practice

Brazing and soldering coils are a good example of the machinability gap. SMCs can be machined into custom shapes with standard tools, whereas hard, brittle ferrites require diamond-bladed tools. In HF tube welding the gap is saturation: ferrite impeder cores in small tubes saturate near 0.4 to 0.5 T, current then flows more freely around the tube ID, and efficiency drops. SMC cores designed for the loading carry more than twice that flux density. Fluxtrol trials on production tube mills report 20 to 50% energy savings and longer impeder life, with the caveats of higher cost and greater cooling needs. See the SMC impeder cores page for the evidence.

Mixing materials on one coil

Laminations and SMCs are often used together on a single coil, with SMC in areas of complex geometry and 3D field, such as the end zones of tube seam annealers. For coils already built with laminations, Fluxtrol LRM is a direct replacement, and the case studies include coils whose life rose after lamination replacement.

Which should you choose

  1. Above 100 kHz with a simple geometry and a modest flux density: ferrite is usually adequate.
  2. Large, simple, low-frequency parts: laminations.
  3. 3D field, complex geometry, high flux density or medium frequency: SMC.
  4. Not sure: contact Fluxtrol with your coil, frequency and power, or see the grade comparison .

Fluxtrol SMCs

Frequently asked questions

Are Fluxtrol materials ferrites?
No. Some users call Fluxtrol materials ferrites or magnetic stones because they look like ferrite pieces and perform the same way in a magnetic circuit. They are soft magnetic composites, made of insulated iron-based particles in a binder, with properties that are much more favorable than ferrites for induction heating.
When are ferrites still the right choice?
Ferrites work well for simple-shaped controllers on small, high-frequency coils, typically above 100 kHz, such as sealing and plastic welding inductors, small brazing coils and tube welding impeders. They offer high permeability in weak fields, high resistivity, chemical resistance and low cost, and can reach 13.56 MHz.
What are the main limits of ferrites?
Low saturation flux density (below about 0.3 to 0.4 T), a low Curie point (typically below 200 to 250 degrees C), sensitivity to thermal shock and temperature, and brittleness. They are hard and require diamond-bladed tools, so complex geometries are difficult and expensive to machine.
SMC or laminations for my coil?
Use laminations for large, simple shapes at low frequency, such as long shunts and channel furnaces. Use SMCs for 3D fields, complex geometry, and medium or high frequency. Both can be used on one coil, with SMC where geometry is complex or the field is 3D, such as the end zones of tube seam annealers.
Does the lower permeability of SMCs hurt performance?
Usually not. Induction coils have open magnetic circuits, so benefit stops growing above a permeability of roughly 10 to 50, and tests show 20 to 40 is sufficient for most systems. Saturation, losses and thermal conductivity matter more, and an overly high permeability can overheat the copper.
Where do SMCs beat ferrites in tube welding?
In small-diameter, heavy-wall tubes, ferrite impeders saturate at about 0.4 to 0.5 T and current flows around the tube ID. SMC impeders designed for the loading carry more than double that flux density, and trials report 20 to 50% energy savings and longer impeder life, but they need good cooling.

Optimizing an induction process?

Talk with a Fluxtrol engineer about your coil, material or heat pattern challenge.